bootcapacity.com > Versus > BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 vs BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 xDrive

BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 (2017) Vs. BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 xDrive (2017)

BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 M Sport BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 xDrive Sport Plus
2017 BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 M Sport Comparison 2017 BMW 3 Series Sport Plus Comparison

General Information

Year 2017 2017
Equipment M Sport Sport Plus
Body Type Sedan Sedan

Engine Specs

Engine 320d 2.0 320d 2.0 xDrive
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine Displacement 1995 cc 1995 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 8 8
Driving System RWD 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 190 HP 190 HP
Torque 400 Nm 400 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 7.2 sn 7.3 sn
Maximum Speed 230 228

Fuel Consumption

City 4.8 L 5.1 L
Highway 3.6 L 3.8 L
Combined 4.2 L 4.4 L
Fuel Tank 57 L 57 L

Dimensions

Length 4633 mm 4633 mm
Width 1811 mm 1811 mm
Height 1429 mm 1429 mm
Curb Weight 1450 kg 1535 kg
Boot Space 480 L 480 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 225 225
Tire Sidewall 50 50
Wheel Rims Size 17 17
2017 BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 M Sport 2017 BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 xDrive Sport Plus

Which one is better?

2017 BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 M Sport Technical Specifications

2017 BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 xDrive Sport Plus Technical Specifications

BMW 3 Series vs BMW 3 Series Comparison

When deciding between 2017 BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 M Sport and 2017 BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 xDrive Sport Plus, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 480 L vs 480 L
  • Engine Power: 190 HP vs 190 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 4.2 L vs 4.4 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the BMW 3 Series offers 480 liters, while the BMW 3 Series stands out with 190 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands