bootcapacity.com > Versus > BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 vs BMW 4 Series 420d 2.0

BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 (2016) Vs. BMW 4 Series 420d 2.0 (2017)

BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 Edition M Sport BMW 4 Series 420d 2.0 M Sport
2016 BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 Edition M Sport Comparison 2017 BMW 4 Series M Sport Comparison

General Information

Year 2016 2017
Equipment Edition M Sport M Sport
Body Type Sedan Coupe

Engine Specs

Engine 320d 2.0 420d 2.0
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine Displacement 1995 cc 1995 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 8 8
Driving System RWD 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 190 HP 190 HP
Torque 400 Nm 400 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 7.2 sn 7.4 sn
Maximum Speed 230 230

Fuel Consumption

City 4.8 L 4.7 L
Highway 3.6 L 3.6 L
Combined 4.2 L 4.7 L
Fuel Tank 57 L 60 L

Dimensions

Length 4633 mm 4640 mm
Width 1811 mm 1825 mm
Height 1429 mm 1377 mm
Curb Weight 1450 kg 1575 kg
Boot Space 480 L 445 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 205 225
Tire Sidewall 60 50
Wheel Rims Size 16 17
2016 BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 Edition M Sport 2017 BMW 4 Series 420d 2.0 M Sport

Which one is better?

2016 BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 Edition M Sport Technical Specifications

2017 BMW 4 Series 420d 2.0 M Sport Technical Specifications

BMW 3 Series vs BMW 4 Series Comparison

When deciding between 2016 BMW 3 Series 320d 2.0 Edition M Sport and 2017 BMW 4 Series 420d 2.0 M Sport, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 480 L vs 445 L
  • Engine Power: 190 HP vs 190 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 4.2 L vs 4.7 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the BMW 3 Series offers 480 liters, while the BMW 4 Series stands out with 190 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands