bootcapacity.com > Versus > BMW 3 Series 320i ED 1.6 vs Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI

BMW 3 Series 320i ED 1.6 (2016) Vs. Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI (2018)

BMW 3 Series 320i ED 1.6 Sport Line Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI R-Line
2016 BMW 3 Series 320i ED 1.6 Sport Line Comparison 2018 Volkswagen Arteon R-Line Comparison

General Information

Year 2016 2018
Equipment Sport Line R-Line
Body Type Sedan Sedan

Engine Specs

Engine 320i ED 1.6 1.5 TSI
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1598 cc 1498 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type Automatic DSG
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 8 7
Driving System RWD Front Wheel Drive

Performance

Engine Power 170 HP 150 HP
Torque 250 Nm 250 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 7.6 sn 9 sn
Maximum Speed 230 222

Fuel Consumption

City 7.3 L 6.5 L
Highway 4.4 L 4.3 L
Combined 5.8 L 5.4 L
Fuel Tank 60 L 66 L

Dimensions

Length 4633 mm 4862 mm
Width 1811 mm 1871 mm
Height 1429 mm 1450 mm
Curb Weight 1390 kg 1643 kg
Boot Space 480 L 563 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 225 245
Tire Sidewall 45 40
Wheel Rims Size 18 19
2016 BMW 3 Series 320i ED 1.6 Sport Line 2018 Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI R-Line

Which one is better?

2016 BMW 3 Series 320i ED 1.6 Sport Line Technical Specifications

2018 Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI R-Line Technical Specifications

BMW 3 Series vs Volkswagen Arteon Comparison

When deciding between 2016 BMW 3 Series 320i ED 1.6 Sport Line and 2018 Volkswagen Arteon 1.5 TSI R-Line, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 480 L vs 563 L
  • Engine Power: 170 HP vs 150 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.8 L vs 5.4 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the BMW 3 Series offers 480 liters, while the Volkswagen Arteon stands out with 150 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands