bootcapacity.com > Versus > BMW 3 Series 320i ED vs BMW 3 Series 320i ED 1.6

BMW 3 Series 320i ED (2015) Vs. BMW 3 Series 320i ED 1.6 (2016)

BMW 3 Series 320i ED M Plus BMW 3 Series 320i ED 1.6 EfficientDynamics
2015 BMW 3 Series 320i ED M Plus Comparison 2016 BMW 3 Series EfficientDynamics Comparison

General Information

Year 2015 2016
Equipment M Plus EfficientDynamics
Body Type Sedan Sedan

Engine Specs

Engine 320i ED 320i ED 1.6
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1995 cc 1598 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 8 8
Driving System RWD RWD

Performance

Engine Power 170 HP 170 HP
Torque 250 Nm 250 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 7.6 sn 7.6 sn
Maximum Speed 230 230

Fuel Consumption

City 7.3 L 7.3 L
Highway 4.4 L 4.4 L
Combined 5.8 L 5.8 L
Fuel Tank 60 L 60 L

Dimensions

Length 4624 mm 4633 mm
Width 1811 mm 1811 mm
Height 1429 mm 1429 mm
Curb Weight 1390 kg 1390 kg
Boot Space 480 L 480 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 205 225
Tire Sidewall 60 45
Wheel Rims Size 16 18
2015 BMW 3 Series 320i ED M Plus 2016 BMW 3 Series 320i ED 1.6 EfficientDynamics

Which one is better?

2015 BMW 3 Series 320i ED M Plus Technical Specifications

2016 BMW 3 Series 320i ED 1.6 EfficientDynamics Technical Specifications

BMW 3 Series vs BMW 3 Series Comparison

When deciding between 2015 BMW 3 Series 320i ED M Plus and 2016 BMW 3 Series 320i ED 1.6 EfficientDynamics, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 480 L vs 480 L
  • Engine Power: 170 HP vs 170 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.8 L vs 5.8 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the BMW 3 Series offers 480 liters, while the BMW 3 Series stands out with 170 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands