bootcapacity.com > Versus > Ford Kuga 1.5 vs Ford Kuga 1.5

2017 Ford Kuga 1.5 ST-Line vs Style

Ford Kuga 1.5 ST-Line Ford Kuga 1.5 Style
2017 Ford Kuga 1.5 ST-Line Comparison 2017 Ford Kuga Style Comparison

General Information

Year 2017 2017
Equipment ST-Line Style
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.5 1.5
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1498 cc 1498 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type AT AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 6 6
Driving System 4x4 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 182 HP 182 HP
Torque 240 Nm 240 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 10.1 sn 10.1 sn
Maximum Speed 200 200

Fuel Consumption

City 9.4 L 9.4 L
Highway 6.3 L 6.3 L
Combined 7.8 L 7.8 L
Fuel Tank 60 L 60 L

Dimensions

Length 4524 mm 4524 mm
Width 1911 mm 1911 mm
Height 1701 mm 1701 mm
Curb Weight 1686 kg 1686 kg
Boot Space 406 L 406 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 235 225
Tire Sidewall 55 55
Wheel Rims Size 17 16
2017 Ford Kuga 1.5 ST-Line 2017 Ford Kuga 1.5 Style

Which one is better?

2017 Ford Kuga 1.5 ST-Line Technical Specifications

2017 Ford Kuga 1.5 Style Technical Specifications

Ford Kuga vs Ford Kuga Comparison

When deciding between 2017 Ford Kuga 1.5 ST-Line and 2017 Ford Kuga 1.5 Style, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 406 L vs 406 L
  • Engine Power: 182 HP vs 182 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 7.8 L vs 7.8 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Kuga offers 406 liters, while the Ford Kuga stands out with 182 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands