bootcapacity.com > Versus > Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue vs Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue

2019 Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue XLT vs Wildtrak

Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue XLT Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue Wildtrak
2019 Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue XLT Comparison 2019 Ford Ranger Wildtrak Comparison

General Information

Year 2019 2019
Equipment XLT Wildtrak
Body Type Pick Up Pick Up

Engine Specs

Engine 2.0 Ecoblue 2.0 Ecoblue
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine Displacement 1997 cc 1997 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type AT AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 10 10
Driving System 4x2 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 170 HP 213 HP
Torque 420 Nm 500 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.4 sn 9.0 sn
Maximum Speed 180 180

Fuel Consumption

City 8.3 L 9.1 L
Highway 6.6 L 7.1 L
Combined 7.5 L 8.1 L
Fuel Tank 80 L 80 L

Dimensions

Length 5359 mm 5359 mm
Width 1977 mm 1977 mm
Height 1821 mm 1821 mm
Curb Weight 2113 kg 2316 kg
Boot Space - L - L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 265 265
Tire Sidewall 65 60
Wheel Rims Size 17 18
2019 Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue XLT 2019 Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue Wildtrak

Which one is better?

2019 Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue XLT Technical Specifications

2019 Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue Wildtrak Technical Specifications

Ford Ranger vs Ford Ranger Comparison

When deciding between 2019 Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue XLT and 2019 Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue Wildtrak, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: - L vs - L
  • Engine Power: 170 HP vs 213 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 7.5 L vs 8.1 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Ranger offers - liters, while the Ford Ranger stands out with 213 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands