bootcapacity.com > Versus > Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue vs Mitsubishi L200 2.4

Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue (2019) Vs. Mitsubishi L200 2.4 (2019)

Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue XLT Mitsubishi L200 2.4 Tornado
2019 Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue XLT Comparison 2019 Mitsubishi L200 Tornado Comparison

General Information

Year 2019 2019
Equipment XLT Tornado
Body Type Pick Up Pick Up

Engine Specs

Engine 2.0 Ecoblue 2.4
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine Displacement 1997 cc 2442 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type AT Manual
Gearbox Automatic Manual
Number of gears 10 6
Driving System 4x2 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 170 HP 154 HP
Torque 420 Nm 380 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.4 sn 15.2 sn
Maximum Speed 180 174

Fuel Consumption

City 8.3 L 7.6 L
Highway 6.6 L 5.8 L
Combined 7.5 L 6.7 L
Fuel Tank 80 L 75 L

Dimensions

Length 5359 mm 5285 mm
Width 1977 mm 1815 mm
Height 1821 mm 1780 mm
Curb Weight 2113 kg 1950 kg
Boot Space - L 1070 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 265 245
Tire Sidewall 65 65
Wheel Rims Size 17 17
2019 Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue XLT 2019 Mitsubishi L200 2.4 Tornado

Which one is better?

2019 Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue XLT Technical Specifications

2019 Mitsubishi L200 2.4 Tornado Technical Specifications

Ford Ranger vs Mitsubishi L200 Comparison

When deciding between 2019 Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue XLT and 2019 Mitsubishi L200 2.4 Tornado, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: - L vs 1070 L
  • Engine Power: 170 HP vs 154 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 7.5 L vs 6.7 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Ranger offers - liters, while the Mitsubishi L200 stands out with 154 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands