bootcapacity.com > Versus > Nissan Juke 1.6 vs Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost

Nissan Juke 1.6 (2018) Vs. Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost (2020)

Nissan Juke 1.6 Tekna Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost Style
2018 Nissan Juke 1.6 Tekna Comparison 2020 Ford EcoSport Style Comparison

General Information

Year 2018 2020
Equipment Tekna Style
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.6 1.0 EcoBoost
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1598 cc 998 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 3

Transmission

Transmission Type CVT AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears ? 6
Driving System 4x2 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 117 HP 125 HP
Torque 158 Nm 170 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.5 sn 11.5 sn
Maximum Speed 170 180

Fuel Consumption

City 8.3 L 7.3 L
Highway 5.2 L 5.1 L
Combined 6.8 L 6.2 L
Fuel Tank 46 L 52 L

Dimensions

Length 4135 mm 4096 mm
Width 1767 mm 1816 mm
Height 1565 mm 1713 mm
Curb Weight 1205 kg 1249 kg
Boot Space 354 L 356 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 215 205
Tire Sidewall 55 50
Wheel Rims Size 15 17
2018 Nissan Juke 1.6 Tekna 2020 Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost Style

Which one is better?

2018 Nissan Juke 1.6 Tekna Technical Specifications

2020 Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost Style Technical Specifications

Nissan Juke vs Ford EcoSport Comparison

When deciding between 2018 Nissan Juke 1.6 Tekna and 2020 Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost Style, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 354 L vs 356 L
  • Engine Power: 117 HP vs 125 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 6.8 L vs 6.2 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Nissan Juke offers 354 liters, while the Ford EcoSport stands out with 125 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands