bootcapacity.com > Versus > Nissan Navara 2.3 dCi vs Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue

Nissan Navara 2.3 dCi (2016) Vs. Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue (2019)

Nissan Navara 2.3 dCi Tekna Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue XLT
2016 Nissan Navara 2.3 dCi Tekna Comparison 2019 Ford Ranger XLT Comparison

General Information

Year 2016 2019
Equipment Tekna XLT
Body Type Pick Up Pick Up

Engine Specs

Engine 2.3 dCi 2.0 Ecoblue
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine Displacement 2298 cc 1997 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type Manual Manual
Gearbox Manual Manual
Number of gears 6 6
Driving System 4x4 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 160 HP 170 HP
Torque 403 Nm 420 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 12.0 sn 11.3 sn
Maximum Speed 172 180

Fuel Consumption

City 7.0 L 8.1 L
Highway 6.1 L 6.3 L
Combined 6.5 L 7.2 L
Fuel Tank 80 L 80 L

Dimensions

Length 5300 mm 5359 mm
Width 1850 mm 1977 mm
Height 1790 mm 1821 mm
Curb Weight 1993 kg 2068 kg
Boot Space ? L - L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 225 255
Tire Sidewall 70 70
Wheel Rims Size 16 16
2016 Nissan Navara 2.3 dCi Tekna 2019 Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue XLT

Which one is better?

2016 Nissan Navara 2.3 dCi Tekna Technical Specifications

2019 Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue XLT Technical Specifications

Nissan Navara vs Ford Ranger Comparison

When deciding between 2016 Nissan Navara 2.3 dCi Tekna and 2019 Ford Ranger 2.0 Ecoblue XLT, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: ? L vs - L
  • Engine Power: 160 HP vs 170 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 6.5 L vs 7.2 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Nissan Navara offers ? liters, while the Ford Ranger stands out with 170 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands