bootcapacity.com > Versus > Nissan Micra 1.2 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 1.2

Nissan Micra 1.2 (2016) Vs. Mitsubishi Space Star 1.2 (2016)

Nissan Micra 1.2 Street Mitsubishi Space Star 1.2 Intense
2016 Nissan Micra 1.2 Street Comparison 2016 Mitsubishi Space Star Intense Comparison

General Information

Year 2016 2016
Equipment Street Intense
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback

Engine Specs

Engine 1.2 1.2
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1198 cc 1193 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type CVT Automatic
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears ? ?
Driving System Front Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive

Performance

Engine Power 80 HP 80 HP
Torque 110 Nm 106 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 13.7 sn 12.8 sn
Maximum Speed 170 174

Fuel Consumption

City 6.1 L 5.5 L
Highway 4.3 L 4.0 L
Combined 5.2 L 4.7 L
Fuel Tank 41 L 35 L

Dimensions

Length 3825 mm 3795 mm
Width 1665 mm 1665 mm
Height 1510 mm 1505 mm
Curb Weight 945 kg 865 kg
Boot Space 265 L 175 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 165 175
Tire Sidewall 70 55
Wheel Rims Size 14 15
2016 Nissan Micra 1.2 Street 2016 Mitsubishi Space Star 1.2 Intense

Which one is better?

2016 Nissan Micra 1.2 Street Technical Specifications

2016 Mitsubishi Space Star 1.2 Intense Technical Specifications

Nissan Micra vs Mitsubishi Space Star Comparison

When deciding between 2016 Nissan Micra 1.2 Street and 2016 Mitsubishi Space Star 1.2 Intense, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 265 L vs 175 L
  • Engine Power: 80 HP vs 80 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.2 L vs 4.7 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Nissan Micra offers 265 liters, while the Mitsubishi Space Star stands out with 80 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands