bootcapacity.com > Versus > Honda CR-V 1.6i DTEC vs Audi Q3 1.4 TFSi

Honda CR-V 1.6i DTEC (2018) Vs. Audi Q3 1.4 TFSi (2017)

Honda CR-V 1.6i DTEC Executive Plus Audi Q3 1.4 TFSi Audi
2018 Honda CR-V 1.6i DTEC Executive Plus Comparison 2017 Audi Q3 Audi Comparison

General Information

Year 2018 2017
Equipment Executive Plus Audi
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.6i DTEC 1.4 TFSi
Fuel Type Diesel Petrol
Engine Displacement 1597 cc 1395 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type AT S-Tronic
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 9 6
Driving System 4x2 Front Wheel Drive

Performance

Engine Power 120 HP 150 HP
Torque 350 Nm 250 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.2 sn 8.9 sn
Maximum Speed 182 204

Fuel Consumption

City 4.6 L 7.6 L
Highway 4.2 L 5.6 L
Combined 4.4 L 6.6 L
Fuel Tank 57 L 64 L

Dimensions

Length 4605 mm 4388 mm
Width 1820 mm 1831 mm
Height 1670 mm 1608 mm
Curb Weight 1728 kg 1405 kg
Boot Space 589 L 460 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 225 215
Tire Sidewall 60 65
Wheel Rims Size 18 16
2018 Honda CR-V 1.6i DTEC Executive Plus 2017 Audi Q3 1.4 TFSi Audi

Which one is better?

2018 Honda CR-V 1.6i DTEC Executive Plus Technical Specifications

2017 Audi Q3 1.4 TFSi Audi Technical Specifications

Honda CR-V vs Audi Q3 Comparison

When deciding between 2018 Honda CR-V 1.6i DTEC Executive Plus and 2017 Audi Q3 1.4 TFSi Audi, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 589 L vs 460 L
  • Engine Power: 120 HP vs 150 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 4.4 L vs 6.6 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Honda CR-V offers 589 liters, while the Audi Q3 stands out with 150 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands