bootcapacity.com > Versus > Mazda CX-3 1.5 vs Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4

Mazda CX-3 1.5 (2016) Vs. Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 (2016)

Mazda CX-3 1.5 Motion Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power
2016 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Motion Comparison 2016 Mazda CX-3 Power Comparison

General Information

Year 2016 2016
Equipment Motion Power
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.5 1.5 4x4
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine Displacement 1499 cc 1499 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type Manual AT
Gearbox Manual Automatic
Number of gears 6 6
Driving System 4x4 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 105 HP 105 HP
Torque 270 Nm 270 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 10.1 sn 11.9 sn
Maximum Speed 177 172

Fuel Consumption

City 4.4 L 5.6 L
Highway 3.8 L 4.9 L
Combined 4.1 L 5.3 L
Fuel Tank 48 L 48 L

Dimensions

Length 4275 mm 4275 mm
Width 1765 mm 1765 mm
Height 1535 mm 1535 mm
Curb Weight 1200 kg 1295 kg
Boot Space 350 L 350 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 215 215
Tire Sidewall 50 50
Wheel Rims Size 18 18
2016 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Motion 2016 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power

Which one is better?

2016 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Motion Technical Specifications

2016 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Technical Specifications

Mazda CX-3 vs Mazda CX-3 Comparison

When deciding between 2016 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Motion and 2016 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 350 L vs 350 L
  • Engine Power: 105 HP vs 105 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 4.1 L vs 5.3 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Mazda CX-3 offers 350 liters, while the Mazda CX-3 stands out with 105 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands