bootcapacity.com > Versus > Chevrolet Captiva 2.0 vs Suzuki Grand Vitara 1.9 DDiS

Chevrolet Captiva 2.0 (2014) Vs. Suzuki Grand Vitara 1.9 DDiS (2014)

Chevrolet Captiva 2.0 LT Suzuki Grand Vitara 1.9 DDiS JLX
2014 Chevrolet Captiva 2.0 LT Comparison 2014 Suzuki Grand Vitara JLX Comparison

General Information

Year 2014 2014
Equipment LT JLX
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 2.0 1.9 DDiS
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine Displacement 1991 cc 1870 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type AT Manual
Gearbox Automatic Manual
Number of gears 6 5
Driving System 4x2 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 163 HP 129 HP
Torque 400 Nm 300 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.2 sn 13.2 sn
Maximum Speed 180 170

Fuel Consumption

City 9.9 L 9.4 L
Highway 6.5 L 6.7 L
Combined 8.2 L 8.1 L
Fuel Tank 65 L 66 L

Dimensions

Length 4679 mm 4470 mm
Width 1868 mm 1810 mm
Height 1756 mm 1695 mm
Curb Weight 1903 kg 1590 kg
Boot Space 447 L 398 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 235 225
Tire Sidewall 60 65
Wheel Rims Size 17 17
2014 Chevrolet Captiva 2.0 LT 2014 Suzuki Grand Vitara 1.9 DDiS JLX

Which one is better?

2014 Chevrolet Captiva 2.0 LT Technical Specifications

2014 Suzuki Grand Vitara 1.9 DDiS JLX Technical Specifications

Chevrolet Captiva vs Suzuki Grand Vitara Comparison

When deciding between 2014 Chevrolet Captiva 2.0 LT and 2014 Suzuki Grand Vitara 1.9 DDiS JLX, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 447 L vs 398 L
  • Engine Power: 163 HP vs 129 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 8.2 L vs 8.1 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Chevrolet Captiva offers 447 liters, while the Suzuki Grand Vitara stands out with 129 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands