bootcapacity.com > Versus > Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 vs Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 (2020) Vs. Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost (2020)

Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 Passion Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line
2020 Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 Passion Comparison 2020 Ford Puma ST-Line Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Passion ST-Line
Body Type Crossover SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.2 Turbo 4x2 1.0 EcoBoost
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1197 cc 999 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 3

Transmission

Transmission Type Multidrive S AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears ? 7
Driving System 4x2 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 116 HP 125 HP
Torque 185 Nm 200 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 10.8 sn 10.2 sn
Maximum Speed 185 190

Fuel Consumption

City 7.4 L 5.8 L
Highway 5.2 L 4.3 L
Combined 6.3 L 5.0 L
Fuel Tank 50 L 42 L

Dimensions

Length 4390 mm 4207 mm
Width 1795 mm 1805 mm
Height 1565 mm 1536 mm
Curb Weight 1465 kg 1326 kg
Boot Space 297 L 456 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 225 215
Tire Sidewall 50 50
Wheel Rims Size 18 18
2020 Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 Passion 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line

Which one is better?

2020 Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 Passion Technical Specifications

2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Technical Specifications

Toyota C-HR vs Ford Puma Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 Passion and 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 297 L vs 456 L
  • Engine Power: 116 HP vs 125 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 6.3 L vs 5.0 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Toyota C-HR offers 297 liters, while the Ford Puma stands out with 125 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands