bootcapacity.com > Versus > Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 vs Kia Stonic 1.4

Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 (2020) Vs. Kia Stonic 1.4 (2020)

Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 Passion Kia Stonic 1.4 Elegance Design Pack
2020 Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 Passion Comparison 2020 Kia Stonic Elegance Design Pack Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Passion Elegance Design Pack
Body Type Crossover SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.2 Turbo 4x2 1.4
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1197 cc 1368 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type Multidrive S AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears ? 6
Driving System 4x2 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 116 HP 100 HP
Torque 185 Nm 133 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 10.8 sn 13.8 sn
Maximum Speed 185 173

Fuel Consumption

City 7.4 L 7.7 L
Highway 5.2 L 5.2 L
Combined 6.3 L 6.5 L
Fuel Tank 50 L 45 L

Dimensions

Length 4390 mm 4140 mm
Width 1795 mm 1760 mm
Height 1565 mm 1500 mm
Curb Weight 1465 kg 1183 kg
Boot Space 297 L 352 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 225 205
Tire Sidewall 50 55
Wheel Rims Size 18 17
2020 Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 Passion 2020 Kia Stonic 1.4 Elegance Design Pack

Which one is better?

2020 Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 Passion Technical Specifications

2020 Kia Stonic 1.4 Elegance Design Pack Technical Specifications

Toyota C-HR vs Kia Stonic Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 Passion and 2020 Kia Stonic 1.4 Elegance Design Pack, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 297 L vs 352 L
  • Engine Power: 116 HP vs 100 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 6.3 L vs 6.5 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Toyota C-HR offers 297 liters, while the Kia Stonic stands out with 100 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands