bootcapacity.com > Versus > Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 vs Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 (2020) Vs. Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost (2023)

Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 Flame Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style
2020 Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 Flame Comparison 2023 Ford Puma Style Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2023
Equipment Flame Style
Body Type Crossover SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.8 4x2 1.0 EcoBoost
Fuel Type Hybrid Petrol
Engine Displacement 1798 cc 999 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 3

Transmission

Transmission Type e-CVT AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears ? 7
Driving System 4x2 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 122 HP 125 HP
Torque 142 Nm 200 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.0 sn 10.2 sn
Maximum Speed 170 190

Fuel Consumption

City 3.2 L 5.8 L
Highway 4.2 L 4.3 L
Combined 3.7 L 5.0 L
Fuel Tank 43 L 42 L

Dimensions

Length 4390 mm 4186 mm
Width 1795 mm 1805 mm
Height 1555 mm 1536 mm
Curb Weight 1495 kg 1326 kg
Boot Space 297 L 456 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 215 225
Tire Sidewall 60 55
Wheel Rims Size 17 17
2020 Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 Flame 2023 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style

Which one is better?

2020 Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 Flame Technical Specifications

2023 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style Technical Specifications

Toyota C-HR vs Ford Puma Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 Flame and 2023 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 297 L vs 456 L
  • Engine Power: 122 HP vs 125 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 3.7 L vs 5.0 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Toyota C-HR offers 297 liters, while the Ford Puma stands out with 125 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands