bootcapacity.com > Versus > Skoda Rapid 1.2 TSI vs Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI

Skoda Rapid 1.2 TSI (2017) Vs. Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI (2017)

Skoda Rapid 1.2 TSI Ambition Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline
2017 Skoda Rapid 1.2 TSI Ambition Comparison 2017 Volkswagen Polo Comfortline Comparison

General Information

Year 2017 2017
Equipment Ambition Comfortline
Body Type Sedan Hatchback

Engine Specs

Engine 1.2 TSI 1.2 TSI
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1197 cc 1197 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type Manual DSG
Gearbox Manual Automatic
Number of gears 5 7
Driving System Front Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive

Performance

Engine Power 90 HP 90 HP
Torque 160 Nm 160 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.3 sn 10.8 sn
Maximum Speed 186 184

Fuel Consumption

City 6.0 L 6.0 L
Highway 4.0 L 4.0 L
Combined 5.0 L 5.0 L
Fuel Tank 55 L 45 L

Dimensions

Length 4483 mm 3972 mm
Width 1706 mm 1682 mm
Height 1461 mm 1453 mm
Curb Weight 1165 kg 1107 kg
Boot Space 530 L 280 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 185 185
Tire Sidewall 60 60
Wheel Rims Size 15 15
2017 Skoda Rapid 1.2 TSI Ambition 2017 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline

Which one is better?

2017 Skoda Rapid 1.2 TSI Ambition Technical Specifications

2017 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline Technical Specifications

Skoda Rapid vs Volkswagen Polo Comparison

When deciding between 2017 Skoda Rapid 1.2 TSI Ambition and 2017 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 530 L vs 280 L
  • Engine Power: 90 HP vs 90 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.0 L vs 5.0 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Skoda Rapid offers 530 liters, while the Volkswagen Polo stands out with 90 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands