bootcapacity.com > Versus > Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi vs Mazda CX-3 1.5

Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi (2020) Vs. Mazda CX-3 1.5 (2020)

Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi Xcellence Mazda CX-3 1.5 Motion
2020 Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi Xcellence Comparison 2020 Mazda CX-3 Motion Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Xcellence Motion
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.0 EcoTSi 1.5
Fuel Type Petrol Diesel
Engine Displacement 999 cc 1499 cc
Number of Cylinders 3 4

Transmission

Transmission Type DSG AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 7 6
Driving System 4x2 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 115 HP 105 HP
Torque 200 Nm 270 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.1 sn 11.9 sn
Maximum Speed 182 172

Fuel Consumption

City 5.8 L 5.6 L
Highway 4.6 L 4.9 L
Combined 5.2 L 5.3 L
Fuel Tank 40 L 44 L

Dimensions

Length 4138 mm 4275 mm
Width 1780 mm 1765 mm
Height 1552 mm 1535 mm
Curb Weight 1135 kg 1295 kg
Boot Space 400 L 350 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 205 215
Tire Sidewall 60 60
Wheel Rims Size 16 16
2020 Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi Xcellence 2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Motion

Which one is better?

2020 Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi Xcellence Technical Specifications

2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Motion Technical Specifications

Seat Arona vs Mazda CX-3 Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi Xcellence and 2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Motion, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 400 L vs 350 L
  • Engine Power: 115 HP vs 105 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.2 L vs 5.3 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Seat Arona offers 400 liters, while the Mazda CX-3 stands out with 105 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands