bootcapacity.com > Versus > Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi vs Nissan Juke 1.2

Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi (2020) Vs. Nissan Juke 1.2 (2018)

Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi Xcellence Nissan Juke 1.2 Skypack
2020 Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi Xcellence Comparison 2018 Nissan Juke Skypack Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2018
Equipment Xcellence Skypack
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.0 EcoTSi 1.2
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 999 cc 1197 cc
Number of Cylinders 3 4

Transmission

Transmission Type DSG Manual
Gearbox Automatic Manual
Number of gears 7 6
Driving System 4x2 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 115 HP 115 HP
Torque 200 Nm 190 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.1 sn 10.8 sn
Maximum Speed 182 178

Fuel Consumption

City 5.8 L 6.9 L
Highway 4.6 L 4.9 L
Combined 5.2 L 5.9 L
Fuel Tank 40 L 46 L

Dimensions

Length 4138 mm 4135 mm
Width 1780 mm 1767 mm
Height 1552 mm 1565 mm
Curb Weight 1135 kg 1236 kg
Boot Space 400 L 354 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 205 205
Tire Sidewall 60 60
Wheel Rims Size 16 16
2020 Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi Xcellence 2018 Nissan Juke 1.2 Skypack

Which one is better?

2020 Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi Xcellence Technical Specifications

2018 Nissan Juke 1.2 Skypack Technical Specifications

Seat Arona vs Nissan Juke Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi Xcellence and 2018 Nissan Juke 1.2 Skypack, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 400 L vs 354 L
  • Engine Power: 115 HP vs 115 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.2 L vs 5.9 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Seat Arona offers 400 liters, while the Nissan Juke stands out with 115 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands