bootcapacity.com > Versus > Nissan Micra 1.0 IG T vs Volkswagen Polo 1.0

Nissan Micra 1.0 IG T (2020) Vs. Volkswagen Polo 1.0 (2020)

Nissan Micra 1.0 IG T Tekna Volkswagen Polo 1.0 Trendline
2020 Nissan Micra 1.0 IG T Tekna Comparison 2020 Volkswagen Polo Trendline Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Tekna Trendline
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback

Engine Specs

Engine 1.0 IG T 1.0
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 999 cc 999 cc
Number of Cylinders 3 3

Transmission

Transmission Type CVT Manual
Gearbox Automatic Manual
Number of gears 5
Driving System Front Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive

Performance

Engine Power 100 HP 80 HP
Torque 144 Nm 93 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 13.0 sn 15.4 sn
Maximum Speed 177 171

Fuel Consumption

City 5.7 L 6.2 L
Highway 4.6 L 4.2 L
Combined 5.1 L 5.2 L
Fuel Tank 41 L 40 L

Dimensions

Length 3999 mm 4053 mm
Width 1743 mm 1751 mm
Height 1455 mm 1461 mm
Curb Weight 1080 kg 1125 kg
Boot Space 300 L 351 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 195 185
Tire Sidewall 55 65
Wheel Rims Size 16 15
2020 Nissan Micra 1.0 IG T Tekna 2020 Volkswagen Polo 1.0 Trendline

Which one is better?

2020 Nissan Micra 1.0 IG T Tekna Technical Specifications

2020 Volkswagen Polo 1.0 Trendline Technical Specifications

Nissan Micra vs Volkswagen Polo Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Nissan Micra 1.0 IG T Tekna and 2020 Volkswagen Polo 1.0 Trendline, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 300 L vs 351 L
  • Engine Power: 100 HP vs 80 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.1 L vs 5.2 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Nissan Micra offers 300 liters, while the Volkswagen Polo stands out with 80 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands