bootcapacity.com > Versus > Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost vs Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost (2020) Vs. Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost (2020)

Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line
2020 Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Comparison 2020 Ford Puma ST-Line Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment ST-Line ST-Line
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.0 EcoBoost 1.0 EcoBoost
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 998 cc 999 cc
Number of Cylinders 3 3

Transmission

Transmission Type Automatic AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 6 7
Driving System 4x2 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 125 HP 125 HP
Torque 170 Nm 200 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.5 sn 10.2 sn
Maximum Speed 180 190

Fuel Consumption

City 7.2 L 5.8 L
Highway 5.0 L 4.3 L
Combined 6.1 L 5.0 L
Fuel Tank 52 L 42 L

Dimensions

Length 4096 mm 4207 mm
Width 1816 mm 1805 mm
Height 1713 mm 1536 mm
Curb Weight 1249 kg 1326 kg
Boot Space 356 L 456 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 215 215
Tire Sidewall 45 50
Wheel Rims Size 18 18
2020 Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line

Which one is better?

2020 Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Technical Specifications

2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Technical Specifications

Ford EcoSport vs Ford Puma Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line and 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 356 L vs 456 L
  • Engine Power: 125 HP vs 125 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 6.1 L vs 5.0 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford EcoSport offers 356 liters, while the Ford Puma stands out with 125 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands