bootcapacity.com > Versus > Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost vs Mazda CX-3 1.5

Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost (2020) Vs. Mazda CX-3 1.5 (2020)

Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Mazda CX-3 1.5 Power Sense Plus
2020 Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Comparison 2020 Mazda CX-3 Power Sense Plus Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment ST-Line Power Sense Plus
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.0 EcoBoost 1.5
Fuel Type Petrol Diesel
Engine Displacement 998 cc 1499 cc
Number of Cylinders 3 4

Transmission

Transmission Type Automatic AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 6 6
Driving System 4x2 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 125 HP 105 HP
Torque 170 Nm 270 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.5 sn 11.9 sn
Maximum Speed 180 172

Fuel Consumption

City 7.2 L 5.6 L
Highway 5.0 L 4.9 L
Combined 6.1 L 5.3 L
Fuel Tank 52 L 48 L

Dimensions

Length 4096 mm 4275 mm
Width 1816 mm 1765 mm
Height 1713 mm 1535 mm
Curb Weight 1249 kg 1295 kg
Boot Space 356 L 350 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 215 215
Tire Sidewall 45 50
Wheel Rims Size 18 18
2020 Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line 2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Power Sense Plus

Which one is better?

2020 Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Technical Specifications

2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Power Sense Plus Technical Specifications

Ford EcoSport vs Mazda CX-3 Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Ford EcoSport 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line and 2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Power Sense Plus, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 356 L vs 350 L
  • Engine Power: 125 HP vs 105 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 6.1 L vs 5.3 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford EcoSport offers 356 liters, while the Mazda CX-3 stands out with 105 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands