bootcapacity.com > Versus > Volkswagen Amarok 3.0 TDI V6 vs Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue

Volkswagen Amarok 3.0 TDI V6 (2020) Vs. Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue (2020)

Volkswagen Amarok 3.0 TDI V6 Canyon Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue XLT
2020 Volkswagen Amarok 3.0 TDI V6 Canyon Comparison 2020 Ford Ranger XLT Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Canyon XLT
Body Type Pick Up Pick Up

Engine Specs

Engine 3.0 TDI V6 2.0 EcoBlue
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine Displacement 2967 cc 1997 cc
Number of Cylinders 6 4

Transmission

Transmission Type DSG AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 8 10
Driving System 4x4 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 204 HP 170 HP
Torque 500 Nm 420 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 9.0 sn 11.4 sn
Maximum Speed 186 180

Fuel Consumption

City 9.0 L 8.3 L
Highway 4.6 L 6.6 L
Combined 6.8 L 7.5 L
Fuel Tank 80 L 80 L

Dimensions

Length 5254 mm 5359 mm
Width 1954 mm 1977 mm
Height 1834 mm 1821 mm
Curb Weight 2286 kg 2113 kg
Boot Space L - L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 255 265
Tire Sidewall 50 65
Wheel Rims Size 20 17
2020 Volkswagen Amarok 3.0 TDI V6 Canyon 2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue XLT

Which one is better?

2020 Volkswagen Amarok 3.0 TDI V6 Canyon Technical Specifications

2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue XLT Technical Specifications

Volkswagen Amarok vs Ford Ranger Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Volkswagen Amarok 3.0 TDI V6 Canyon and 2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue XLT, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: L vs - L
  • Engine Power: 204 HP vs 170 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 6.8 L vs 7.5 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Volkswagen Amarok offers liters, while the Ford Ranger stands out with 170 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands