bootcapacity.com > Versus > Mitsubishi L200 2.2 4x4 vs Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4

Mitsubishi L200 2.2 4x4 (2020) Vs. Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 (2020)

Mitsubishi L200 2.2 4x4 Premium Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 XLT
2020 Mitsubishi L200 2.2 4x4 Premium Comparison 2020 Ford Ranger XLT Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Premium XLT
Body Type Pick Up Pick Up

Engine Specs

Engine 2.2 4x4 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine Displacement 2268 cc 1997 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type AT AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 6 10
Driving System 4x4 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 150 HP 170 HP
Torque 400 Nm 420 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 sn 11.4 sn
Maximum Speed 171 180

Fuel Consumption

City 8.6 L 6.9 L
Highway 7.3 L 7.2 L
Combined 7.9 L 7.1 L
Fuel Tank 75 L 80 L

Dimensions

Length 5305 mm 5359 mm
Width 1815 mm 1977 mm
Height 1780 mm 1821 mm
Curb Weight 2035 kg 2202 kg
Boot Space 1105 L - L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 265 265
Tire Sidewall 60 65
Wheel Rims Size 18 17
2020 Mitsubishi L200 2.2 4x4 Premium 2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 XLT

Which one is better?

2020 Mitsubishi L200 2.2 4x4 Premium Technical Specifications

2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 XLT Technical Specifications

Mitsubishi L200 vs Ford Ranger Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Mitsubishi L200 2.2 4x4 Premium and 2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 XLT, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 1105 L vs - L
  • Engine Power: 150 HP vs 170 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 7.9 L vs 7.1 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Mitsubishi L200 offers 1105 liters, while the Ford Ranger stands out with 170 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands