bootcapacity.com > Versus > Kia Niro 1.6 4x2 vs Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2

Kia Niro 1.6 4x2 (2020) Vs. Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 (2020)

Kia Niro 1.6 4x2 Elegance Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 Flame
2020 Kia Niro 1.6 4x2 Elegance Comparison 2020 Toyota C-HR Flame Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Elegance Flame
Body Type Crossover Crossover

Engine Specs

Engine 1.6 4x2 1.8 4x2
Fuel Type Hybrid Hybrid
Engine Displacement 1580 cc 1798 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type DCT e-CVT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 6 ?
Driving System 4x2 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 141 HP 122 HP
Torque 265 Nm 142 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.5 sn 11.0 sn
Maximum Speed 162 170

Fuel Consumption

City 4.2 L 3.2 L
Highway 3.4 L 4.2 L
Combined 3.8 L 3.7 L
Fuel Tank 45 L 43 L

Dimensions

Length 4355 mm 4390 mm
Width 1805 mm 1795 mm
Height 1545 mm 1555 mm
Curb Weight 1425 kg 1495 kg
Boot Space 427 L 297 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 205 215
Tire Sidewall 60 60
Wheel Rims Size 16 17
2020 Kia Niro 1.6 4x2 Elegance 2020 Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 Flame

Which one is better?

2020 Kia Niro 1.6 4x2 Elegance Technical Specifications

2020 Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 Flame Technical Specifications

Kia Niro vs Toyota C-HR Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Kia Niro 1.6 4x2 Elegance and 2020 Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 Flame, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 427 L vs 297 L
  • Engine Power: 141 HP vs 122 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 3.8 L vs 3.7 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Kia Niro offers 427 liters, while the Toyota C-HR stands out with 122 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands