bootcapacity.com > Versus > Kia Stonic 1.0 vs Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

Kia Stonic 1.0 (2020) Vs. Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost (2020)

Kia Stonic 1.0 Elegance Design Pack Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line
2020 Kia Stonic 1.0 Elegance Design Pack Comparison 2020 Ford Puma ST-Line Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Elegance Design Pack ST-Line
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.0 1.0 EcoBoost
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 998 cc 999 cc
Number of Cylinders 3 3

Transmission

Transmission Type DCT AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 7 7
Driving System 4x2 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 120 HP 125 HP
Torque 171 Nm 200 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 10.6 sn 10.2 sn
Maximum Speed 185 190

Fuel Consumption

City 5.8 L 5.8 L
Highway 4.9 L 4.3 L
Combined 5.3 L 5.0 L
Fuel Tank 45 L 42 L

Dimensions

Length 4140 mm 4207 mm
Width 1760 mm 1805 mm
Height 1500 mm 1536 mm
Curb Weight 1220 kg 1326 kg
Boot Space 352 L 456 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 205 215
Tire Sidewall 55 50
Wheel Rims Size 17 18
2020 Kia Stonic 1.0 Elegance Design Pack 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line

Which one is better?

2020 Kia Stonic 1.0 Elegance Design Pack Technical Specifications

2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Technical Specifications

Kia Stonic vs Ford Puma Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Kia Stonic 1.0 Elegance Design Pack and 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 352 L vs 456 L
  • Engine Power: 120 HP vs 125 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.3 L vs 5.0 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Kia Stonic offers 352 liters, while the Ford Puma stands out with 125 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands