bootcapacity.com > Versus > Mazda CX-3 1.5 vs Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi

Mazda CX-3 1.5 (2020) Vs. Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi (2021)

Mazda CX-3 1.5 Motion Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi Style
2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Motion Comparison 2021 Seat Arona Style Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2021
Equipment Motion Style
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.5 1.0 EcoTSi
Fuel Type Diesel Petrol
Engine Displacement 1499 cc 999 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 3

Transmission

Transmission Type AT DSG
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 6 7
Driving System 4x4 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 105 HP 110 HP
Torque 270 Nm 200 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.9 sn 10.1 sn
Maximum Speed 172 190

Fuel Consumption

City 5.6 L 5.5 L
Highway 4.9 L 4.4 L
Combined 5.3 L 5.0 L
Fuel Tank 44 L 40 L

Dimensions

Length 4275 mm 4138 mm
Width 1765 mm 1780 mm
Height 1535 mm 1552 mm
Curb Weight 1295 kg 1135 kg
Boot Space 350 L 400 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 215 205
Tire Sidewall 60 60
Wheel Rims Size 16 16
2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Motion 2021 Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi Style

Which one is better?

2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Motion Technical Specifications

2021 Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi Style Technical Specifications

Mazda CX-3 vs Seat Arona Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Motion and 2021 Seat Arona 1.0 EcoTSi Style, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 350 L vs 400 L
  • Engine Power: 105 HP vs 110 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.3 L vs 5.0 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Mazda CX-3 offers 350 liters, while the Seat Arona stands out with 110 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands