bootcapacity.com > Versus > Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 vs Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 (2020) Vs. Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost (2021)

Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style
2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense Comparison 2021 Ford Puma Style Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2021
Equipment Power Sense Style
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.5 4x4 1.0 EcoBoost
Fuel Type Diesel Petrol
Engine Displacement 1499 cc 999 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 3

Transmission

Transmission Type AT AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 6 7
Driving System 4x4 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 105 HP 125 HP
Torque 270 Nm 200 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.9 sn 10.2 sn
Maximum Speed 172 190

Fuel Consumption

City 5.6 L 5.8 L
Highway 4.9 L 4.3 L
Combined 5.3 L 5.0 L
Fuel Tank 48 L 42 L

Dimensions

Length 4275 mm 4186 mm
Width 1765 mm 1805 mm
Height 1535 mm 1536 mm
Curb Weight 1295 kg 1326 kg
Boot Space 350 L 456 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 215 225
Tire Sidewall 50 55
Wheel Rims Size 18 17
2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense 2021 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style

Which one is better?

2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense Technical Specifications

2021 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style Technical Specifications

Mazda CX-3 vs Ford Puma Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense and 2021 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 350 L vs 456 L
  • Engine Power: 105 HP vs 125 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.3 L vs 5.0 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Mazda CX-3 offers 350 liters, while the Ford Puma stands out with 125 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands