bootcapacity.com > Versus > Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 vs Hyundai Kona 1.6T GDI

Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 (2020) Vs. Hyundai Kona 1.6T GDI (2020)

Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense Hyundai Kona 1.6T GDI Elite Smart
2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense Comparison 2020 Hyundai Kona Elite Smart Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Power Sense Elite Smart
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.5 4x4 1.6T GDI
Fuel Type Diesel Petrol
Engine Displacement 1499 cc 1591 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type AT DCT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 6 7
Driving System 4x4 Front Wheel Drive

Performance

Engine Power 105 HP 177 HP
Torque 270 Nm 265 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.9 sn 7.7 sn
Maximum Speed 172 265

Fuel Consumption

City 5.6 L 6.9 L
Highway 4.9 L 5.9 L
Combined 5.3 L 6.4 L
Fuel Tank 48 L 50 L

Dimensions

Length 4275 mm 4165 mm
Width 1765 mm 1800 mm
Height 1535 mm 1565 mm
Curb Weight 1295 kg 1387 kg
Boot Space 350 L 361 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 215 235
Tire Sidewall 50 45
Wheel Rims Size 18 18
2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense 2020 Hyundai Kona 1.6T GDI Elite Smart

Which one is better?

2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense Technical Specifications

2020 Hyundai Kona 1.6T GDI Elite Smart Technical Specifications

Mazda CX-3 vs Hyundai Kona Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense and 2020 Hyundai Kona 1.6T GDI Elite Smart, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 350 L vs 361 L
  • Engine Power: 105 HP vs 177 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.3 L vs 6.4 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Mazda CX-3 offers 350 liters, while the Hyundai Kona stands out with 177 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands