bootcapacity.com > Versus > Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 vs Subaru Forester 2.0i AWD

Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 (2020) Vs. Subaru Forester 2.0i AWD (2020)

Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense Subaru Forester 2.0i AWD e-Xclusive
2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense Comparison 2020 Subaru Forester e-Xclusive Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Power Sense e-Xclusive
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.5 4x4 2.0i AWD
Fuel Type Diesel Petrol & Electric
Engine Displacement 1499 cc 1995 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type AT Lineartronic
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 6 7
Driving System 4x4 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 105 HP 150 HP
Torque 270 Nm 194 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.9 sn 11.8 sn
Maximum Speed 172 188

Fuel Consumption

City 5.6 L 7.4 L
Highway 4.9 L 6.4 L
Combined 5.3 L 6.9 L
Fuel Tank 48 L 48 L

Dimensions

Length 4275 mm 4625 mm
Width 1765 mm 1815 mm
Height 1535 mm 1730 mm
Curb Weight 1295 kg 1767 kg
Boot Space 350 L 509 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 215 225
Tire Sidewall 50 55
Wheel Rims Size 18 18
2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense 2020 Subaru Forester 2.0i AWD e-Xclusive

Which one is better?

2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense Technical Specifications

2020 Subaru Forester 2.0i AWD e-Xclusive Technical Specifications

Mazda CX-3 vs Subaru Forester Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense and 2020 Subaru Forester 2.0i AWD e-Xclusive, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 350 L vs 509 L
  • Engine Power: 105 HP vs 150 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.3 L vs 6.9 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Mazda CX-3 offers 350 liters, while the Subaru Forester stands out with 150 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands