bootcapacity.com > Versus > Mazda CX-3 1.5 vs Audi Q2 1.5 TFSI

Mazda CX-3 1.5 (2020) Vs. Audi Q2 1.5 TFSI (2020)

Mazda CX-3 1.5 Power Audi Q2 1.5 TFSI Design
2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Power Comparison 2020 Audi Q2 Design Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Power Design
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.5 1.5 TFSI
Fuel Type Diesel Petrol
Engine Displacement 1499 cc 1498 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type AT S Tronic
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 6 7
Driving System 4x4 Front Wheel Drive

Performance

Engine Power 105 HP 150 HP
Torque 270 Nm 250 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.9 sn 8.5 sn
Maximum Speed 172 212

Fuel Consumption

City 5.6 L 6.8 L
Highway 4.9 L 4.8 L
Combined 5.3 L 5.8 L
Fuel Tank 48 L 50 L

Dimensions

Length 4275 mm 4191 mm
Width 1765 mm 1794 mm
Height 1535 mm 1508 mm
Curb Weight 1295 kg 1290 kg
Boot Space 350 L 405 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 215 215
Tire Sidewall 50 60
Wheel Rims Size 18 16
2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Power 2020 Audi Q2 1.5 TFSI Design

Which one is better?

2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Power Technical Specifications

2020 Audi Q2 1.5 TFSI Design Technical Specifications

Mazda CX-3 vs Audi Q2 Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Power and 2020 Audi Q2 1.5 TFSI Design, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 350 L vs 405 L
  • Engine Power: 105 HP vs 150 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.3 L vs 5.8 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Mazda CX-3 offers 350 liters, while the Audi Q2 stands out with 150 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands