bootcapacity.com > Versus > Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBlue vs Volvo XC60 2.0 B4

Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBlue (2020) Vs. Volvo XC60 2.0 B4 (2020)

Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBlue Style Volvo XC60 2.0 B4 Inscription
2020 Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBlue Style Comparison 2020 Volvo XC60 Inscription Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Style Inscription
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.5 EcoBlue 2.0 B4
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine Displacement 1499 cc 1969 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type Automatic Geartronic
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 8 8
Driving System 4x2 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 120 HP 197 HP
Torque 300 Nm 400 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.7 sn 8.3 sn
Maximum Speed 180 205

Fuel Consumption

City 4.7 L 6.8 L
Highway 3.8 L 4.5 L
Combined 4.3 L 5.7 L
Fuel Tank 54 L 71 L

Dimensions

Length 4614 mm 4688 mm
Width 1883 mm 1902 mm
Height 1678 mm 1658 mm
Curb Weight 1576 kg 1950 kg
Boot Space 511 L 505 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 225 235
Tire Sidewall 65 60
Wheel Rims Size 17 18
2020 Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBlue Style 2020 Volvo XC60 2.0 B4 Inscription

Which one is better?

2020 Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBlue Style Technical Specifications

2020 Volvo XC60 2.0 B4 Inscription Technical Specifications

Ford Kuga vs Volvo XC60 Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBlue Style and 2020 Volvo XC60 2.0 B4 Inscription, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 511 L vs 505 L
  • Engine Power: 120 HP vs 197 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 4.3 L vs 5.7 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Kuga offers 511 liters, while the Volvo XC60 stands out with 197 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands