Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrak | Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 XLT | |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
General Information |
||
Year | 2020 | 2020 |
Equipment | Wildtrak | XLT |
Body Type | Pick Up | Pick Up |
Engine Specs |
||
Engine | 2.0 EcoBlue | 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Engine Displacement | 1997 cc | 1997 cc |
Number of Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
Transmission |
||
Transmission Type | AT | AT |
Gearbox | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of gears | 10 | 10 |
Driving System | 4x4 | 4x4 |
Performance |
||
Engine Power | 213 HP | 170 HP |
Torque | 500 Nm | 420 Nm |
Acceleration 0-100 | 9.0 sn | 11.4 sn |
Maximum Speed | 180 | 180 |
Fuel Consumption |
||
City | 9.1 L | 6.9 L |
Highway | 7.1 L | 7.2 L |
Combined | 8.1 L | 7.1 L |
Fuel Tank | 80 L | 80 L |
Dimensions |
||
Length | 5359 mm | 5359 mm |
Width | 1977 mm | 1977 mm |
Height | 1821 mm | 1821 mm |
Curb Weight | 2316 kg | 2202 kg |
Boot Space | - L | - L |
Tire and Wheel |
||
Tire Tread | 265 | 265 |
Tire Sidewall | 60 | 65 |
Wheel Rims Size | 18 | 17 |
2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrak | 2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 XLT |
When deciding between 2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrak and 2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 XLT, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.
If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Ranger offers - liters, while the Ford Ranger stands out with 170 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.