bootcapacity.com > Versus > Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue vs Volkswagen Amarok 3.0 TDI V6

Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue (2020) Vs. Volkswagen Amarok 3.0 TDI V6 (2020)

Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue XLT Volkswagen Amarok 3.0 TDI V6 Canyon
2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue XLT Comparison 2020 Volkswagen Amarok Canyon Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment XLT Canyon
Body Type Pick Up Pick Up

Engine Specs

Engine 2.0 EcoBlue 3.0 TDI V6
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine Displacement 1997 cc 2967 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 6

Transmission

Transmission Type AT DSG
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 10 8
Driving System 4x2 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 170 HP 204 HP
Torque 420 Nm 500 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.4 sn 9.0 sn
Maximum Speed 180 186

Fuel Consumption

City 8.3 L 9.0 L
Highway 6.6 L 4.6 L
Combined 7.5 L 6.8 L
Fuel Tank 80 L 80 L

Dimensions

Length 5359 mm 5254 mm
Width 1977 mm 1954 mm
Height 1821 mm 1834 mm
Curb Weight 2113 kg 2286 kg
Boot Space - L L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 265 255
Tire Sidewall 65 50
Wheel Rims Size 17 20
2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue XLT 2020 Volkswagen Amarok 3.0 TDI V6 Canyon

Which one is better?

2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue XLT Technical Specifications

2020 Volkswagen Amarok 3.0 TDI V6 Canyon Technical Specifications

Ford Ranger vs Volkswagen Amarok Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue XLT and 2020 Volkswagen Amarok 3.0 TDI V6 Canyon, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: - L vs L
  • Engine Power: 170 HP vs 204 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 7.5 L vs 6.8 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Ranger offers - liters, while the Volkswagen Amarok stands out with 204 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands