bootcapacity.com > Versus > Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 vs Mitsubishi L200 2.2

Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 (2020) Vs. Mitsubishi L200 2.2 (2020)

Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 XLT Mitsubishi L200 2.2 Blizzard
2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 XLT Comparison 2020 Mitsubishi L200 Blizzard Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment XLT Blizzard
Body Type Pick Up Pick Up

Engine Specs

Engine 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 2.2
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine Displacement 1997 cc 2268 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type AT AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 10 6
Driving System 4x4 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 170 HP 150 HP
Torque 420 Nm 400 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.4 sn sn
Maximum Speed 180 171

Fuel Consumption

City 6.9 L 8.6 L
Highway 7.2 L 7.3 L
Combined 7.1 L 7.9 L
Fuel Tank 80 L 75 L

Dimensions

Length 5359 mm 5305 mm
Width 1977 mm 1815 mm
Height 1821 mm 1780 mm
Curb Weight 2202 kg 2035 kg
Boot Space - L 1105 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 265 265
Tire Sidewall 65 60
Wheel Rims Size 17 18
2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 XLT 2020 Mitsubishi L200 2.2 Blizzard

Which one is better?

2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 XLT Technical Specifications

2020 Mitsubishi L200 2.2 Blizzard Technical Specifications

Ford Ranger vs Mitsubishi L200 Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue 4x4 XLT and 2020 Mitsubishi L200 2.2 Blizzard, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: - L vs 1105 L
  • Engine Power: 170 HP vs 150 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 7.1 L vs 7.9 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Ranger offers - liters, while the Mitsubishi L200 stands out with 150 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands