bootcapacity.com > Versus > Mazda CX-5 2.0 vs Jeep Compass 1.4 AWD

Mazda CX-5 2.0 (2020) Vs. Jeep Compass 1.4 AWD (2020)

Mazda CX-5 2.0 Power Sense Plus Jeep Compass 1.4 AWD Limited Executive
2020 Mazda CX-5 2.0 Power Sense Plus Comparison 2020 Jeep Compass Limited Executive Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Power Sense Plus Limited Executive
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 2.0 1.4 AWD
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1998 cc 1368 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type AT Automatic
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 6 9
Driving System 4x4 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 165 HP 170 HP
Torque 213 Nm 250 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 10.3 sn 9.5 sn
Maximum Speed 188 200

Fuel Consumption

City 8.4 L 8.7 L
Highway 6.1 L 5.9 L
Combined 7.3 L 7.3 L
Fuel Tank 58 L 60 L

Dimensions

Length 4555 mm 4394 mm
Width 1840 mm 1819 mm
Height 1670 mm 1644 mm
Curb Weight 1555 kg 1615 kg
Boot Space 503 L 438 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 225 225
Tire Sidewall 55 55
Wheel Rims Size 19 18
2020 Mazda CX-5 2.0 Power Sense Plus 2020 Jeep Compass 1.4 AWD Limited Executive

Which one is better?

2020 Mazda CX-5 2.0 Power Sense Plus Technical Specifications

2020 Jeep Compass 1.4 AWD Limited Executive Technical Specifications

Mazda CX-5 vs Jeep Compass Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Mazda CX-5 2.0 Power Sense Plus and 2020 Jeep Compass 1.4 AWD Limited Executive, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 503 L vs 438 L
  • Engine Power: 165 HP vs 170 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 7.3 L vs 7.3 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Mazda CX-5 offers 503 liters, while the Jeep Compass stands out with 170 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands