bootcapacity.com > Versus > Mazda CX-5 2.0 vs Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 AWD

Mazda CX-5 2.0 (2020) Vs. Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 AWD (2020)

Mazda CX-5 2.0 Power Sense Plus Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 AWD R-Design
2020 Mazda CX-5 2.0 Power Sense Plus Comparison 2020 Volvo XC40 R-Design Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Power Sense Plus R-Design
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 2.0 2.0 T4 AWD
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1998 cc 1969 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type AT Geartronic
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 6 8
Driving System 4x4 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 165 HP 190 HP
Torque 213 Nm 300 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 10.3 sn 8.5 sn
Maximum Speed 188 210

Fuel Consumption

City 8.4 L 8.9 L
Highway 6.1 L 5.9 L
Combined 7.3 L 7.4 L
Fuel Tank 58 L 54 L

Dimensions

Length 4555 mm 4425 mm
Width 1840 mm 1863 mm
Height 1670 mm 1652 mm
Curb Weight 1555 kg 1706 kg
Boot Space 503 L 460 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 225 235
Tire Sidewall 55 50
Wheel Rims Size 19 19
2020 Mazda CX-5 2.0 Power Sense Plus 2020 Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 AWD R-Design

Which one is better?

2020 Mazda CX-5 2.0 Power Sense Plus Technical Specifications

2020 Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 AWD R-Design Technical Specifications

Mazda CX-5 vs Volvo XC40 Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Mazda CX-5 2.0 Power Sense Plus and 2020 Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 AWD R-Design, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 503 L vs 460 L
  • Engine Power: 165 HP vs 190 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 7.3 L vs 7.4 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Mazda CX-5 offers 503 liters, while the Volvo XC40 stands out with 190 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands