bootcapacity.com > Versus > Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost vs Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style vs ST-Line

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line
2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style Comparison 2020 Ford Puma ST-Line Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Style ST-Line
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.0 EcoBoost 1.0 EcoBoost
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol & Electric
Engine Displacement 999 cc 999 cc
Number of Cylinders 3 3

Transmission

Transmission Type Manual Manual
Gearbox Manual Manual
Number of gears 6 6
Driving System 4x2 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 95 HP 155 HP
Torque 170 Nm 240 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.9 sn 9.0 sn
Maximum Speed 175 205

Fuel Consumption

City 5.4 L 5.1 L
Highway 4.0 L 3.9 L
Combined 4.7 L 4.5 L
Fuel Tank 42 L 42 L

Dimensions

Length 4186 mm 4207 mm
Width 1805 mm 1805 mm
Height 1536 mm 1536 mm
Curb Weight 1269 kg 1280 kg
Boot Space 456 L 401 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 225 215
Tire Sidewall 55 50
Wheel Rims Size 17 18
2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line

Which one is better?

2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style Technical Specifications

2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Technical Specifications

Ford Puma vs Ford Puma Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style and 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 456 L vs 401 L
  • Engine Power: 95 HP vs 155 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 4.7 L vs 4.5 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Puma offers 456 liters, while the Ford Puma stands out with 155 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands