bootcapacity.com > Versus > Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost vs Kia Stonic 1.4

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost (2020) Vs. Kia Stonic 1.4 (2020)

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style Kia Stonic 1.4 Elegance
2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style Comparison 2020 Kia Stonic Elegance Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Style Elegance
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.0 EcoBoost 1.4
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 999 cc 1368 cc
Number of Cylinders 3 4

Transmission

Transmission Type Manual AT
Gearbox Manual Automatic
Number of gears 6 6
Driving System 4x2 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 95 HP 100 HP
Torque 170 Nm 133 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.9 sn 13.8 sn
Maximum Speed 175 173

Fuel Consumption

City 5.4 L 7.7 L
Highway 4.0 L 5.2 L
Combined 4.7 L 6.5 L
Fuel Tank 42 L 45 L

Dimensions

Length 4186 mm 4140 mm
Width 1805 mm 1760 mm
Height 1536 mm 1500 mm
Curb Weight 1269 kg 1183 kg
Boot Space 456 L 352 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 225 205
Tire Sidewall 55 55
Wheel Rims Size 17 17
2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style 2020 Kia Stonic 1.4 Elegance

Which one is better?

2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style Technical Specifications

2020 Kia Stonic 1.4 Elegance Technical Specifications

Ford Puma vs Kia Stonic Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost Style and 2020 Kia Stonic 1.4 Elegance, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 456 L vs 352 L
  • Engine Power: 95 HP vs 100 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 4.7 L vs 6.5 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Puma offers 456 liters, while the Kia Stonic stands out with 100 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands