Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line | Mazda CX-3 1.5 Reflex | |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
General Information |
||
Year | 2020 | 2020 |
Equipment | ST-Line | Reflex |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Specs |
||
Engine | 1.0 EcoBoost | 1.5 |
Fuel Type | Petrol | Diesel |
Engine Displacement | 999 cc | 1499 cc |
Number of Cylinders | 3 | 4 |
Transmission |
||
Transmission Type | AT | Manual |
Gearbox | Automatic | Manual |
Number of gears | 7 | 6 |
Driving System | 4x2 | 4x2 |
Performance |
||
Engine Power | 125 HP | 105 HP |
Torque | 200 Nm | 270 Nm |
Acceleration 0-100 | 10.2 sn | 10.1 sn |
Maximum Speed | 190 | 177 |
Fuel Consumption |
||
City | 5.8 L | 4.4 L |
Highway | 4.3 L | 3.8 L |
Combined | 5.0 L | 4.1 L |
Fuel Tank | 42 L | 48 L |
Dimensions |
||
Length | 4207 mm | 4275 mm |
Width | 1805 mm | 1765 mm |
Height | 1536 mm | 1535 mm |
Curb Weight | 1326 kg | 1200 kg |
Boot Space | 456 L | 350 L |
Tire and Wheel |
||
Tire Tread | 215 | 215 |
Tire Sidewall | 50 | 50 |
Wheel Rims Size | 18 | 18 |
2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line | 2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Reflex |
When deciding between 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line and 2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 Reflex, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.
If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Puma offers 456 liters, while the Mazda CX-3 stands out with 105 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.