bootcapacity.com > Versus > Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost vs Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost (2020) Vs. Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 (2020)

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 Flame
2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Comparison 2020 Toyota C-HR Flame Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment ST-Line Flame
Body Type SUV Crossover

Engine Specs

Engine 1.0 EcoBoost 1.2 Turbo 4x2
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 999 cc 1197 cc
Number of Cylinders 3 4

Transmission

Transmission Type AT MultiDrive S
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 7 ?
Driving System 4x2 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 125 HP 116 HP
Torque 200 Nm 185 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 10.2 sn 10.8 sn
Maximum Speed 190 185

Fuel Consumption

City 5.8 L 7.4 L
Highway 4.3 L 5.3 L
Combined 5.0 L 6.3 L
Fuel Tank 42 L 50 L

Dimensions

Length 4207 mm 4390 mm
Width 1805 mm 1795 mm
Height 1536 mm 1565 mm
Curb Weight 1326 kg 1465 kg
Boot Space 456 L 297 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 215 215
Tire Sidewall 50 60
Wheel Rims Size 18 17
2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line 2020 Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 Flame

Which one is better?

2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Technical Specifications

2020 Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 Flame Technical Specifications

Ford Puma vs Toyota C-HR Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line and 2020 Toyota C-HR 1.2 Turbo 4x2 Flame, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 456 L vs 297 L
  • Engine Power: 125 HP vs 116 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.0 L vs 6.3 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Puma offers 456 liters, while the Toyota C-HR stands out with 116 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands