bootcapacity.com > Versus > Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost vs Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost (2020) Vs. Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 (2020)

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 Passion
2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Comparison 2020 Toyota C-HR Passion Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment ST-Line Passion
Body Type SUV Crossover

Engine Specs

Engine 1.0 EcoBoost 1.8 4x2
Fuel Type Petrol & Electric Hybrid
Engine Displacement 999 cc 1798 cc
Number of Cylinders 3 4

Transmission

Transmission Type Manual e-CVT
Gearbox Manual Automatic
Number of gears 6 ?
Driving System 4x2 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 155 HP 122 HP
Torque 240 Nm 142 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 9.0 sn 11.0 sn
Maximum Speed 205 170

Fuel Consumption

City 5.1 L 3.2 L
Highway 3.9 L 4.2 L
Combined 4.5 L 3.7 L
Fuel Tank 42 L 43 L

Dimensions

Length 4207 mm 4390 mm
Width 1805 mm 1795 mm
Height 1536 mm 1555 mm
Curb Weight 1280 kg 1495 kg
Boot Space 401 L 297 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 215 225
Tire Sidewall 50 50
Wheel Rims Size 18 18
2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line 2020 Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 Passion

Which one is better?

2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Technical Specifications

2020 Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 Passion Technical Specifications

Ford Puma vs Toyota C-HR Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line and 2020 Toyota C-HR 1.8 4x2 Passion, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 401 L vs 297 L
  • Engine Power: 155 HP vs 122 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 4.5 L vs 3.7 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Puma offers 401 liters, while the Toyota C-HR stands out with 122 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands