Ford Kuga 2.5 Hibrit ST-Line | Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line | |
---|---|---|
![]() |
![]() |
|
General Information |
||
Year | 2020 | 2020 |
Equipment | ST-Line | ST-Line |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Specs |
||
Engine | 2.5 Hibrit | 1.0 EcoBoost |
Fuel Type | Petrol & Electric | Petrol & Electric |
Engine Displacement | 2488 cc | 999 cc |
Number of Cylinders | 4 | 3 |
Transmission |
||
Transmission Type | CVT | Manual |
Gearbox | Automatic | Manual |
Number of gears | ? | 6 |
Driving System | 4x2 | 4x2 |
Performance |
||
Engine Power | 225 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 200 Nm | 240 Nm |
Acceleration 0-100 | 9.2 sn | 9.0 sn |
Maximum Speed | 200 | 205 |
Fuel Consumption |
||
City | 1.2 L | 5.1 L |
Highway | 1.2 L | 3.9 L |
Combined | 1.2 L | 4.5 L |
Fuel Tank | 42 L | 42 L |
Dimensions |
||
Length | 4614 mm | 4207 mm |
Width | 1883 mm | 1805 mm |
Height | 1678 mm | 1536 mm |
Curb Weight | 1844 kg | 1280 kg |
Boot Space | 511 L | 401 L |
Tire and Wheel |
||
Tire Tread | 225 | 215 |
Tire Sidewall | 55 | 50 |
Wheel Rims Size | 19 | 18 |
2020 Ford Kuga 2.5 Hibrit ST-Line | 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line |
When deciding between 2020 Ford Kuga 2.5 Hibrit ST-Line and 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.
If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Kuga offers 511 liters, while the Ford Puma stands out with 155 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.