bootcapacity.com > Versus > Ford Kuga 2.5 Hibrit vs Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

Ford Kuga 2.5 Hibrit (2020) Vs. Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost (2020)

Ford Kuga 2.5 Hibrit ST-Line Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line
2020 Ford Kuga 2.5 Hibrit ST-Line Comparison 2020 Ford Puma ST-Line Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment ST-Line ST-Line
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 2.5 Hibrit 1.0 EcoBoost
Fuel Type Petrol & Electric Petrol & Electric
Engine Displacement 2488 cc 999 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 3

Transmission

Transmission Type CVT Manual
Gearbox Automatic Manual
Number of gears ? 6
Driving System 4x2 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 225 HP 155 HP
Torque 200 Nm 240 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 9.2 sn 9.0 sn
Maximum Speed 200 205

Fuel Consumption

City 1.2 L 5.1 L
Highway 1.2 L 3.9 L
Combined 1.2 L 4.5 L
Fuel Tank 42 L 42 L

Dimensions

Length 4614 mm 4207 mm
Width 1883 mm 1805 mm
Height 1678 mm 1536 mm
Curb Weight 1844 kg 1280 kg
Boot Space 511 L 401 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 225 215
Tire Sidewall 55 50
Wheel Rims Size 19 18
2020 Ford Kuga 2.5 Hibrit ST-Line 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line

Which one is better?

2020 Ford Kuga 2.5 Hibrit ST-Line Technical Specifications

2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Technical Specifications

Ford Kuga vs Ford Puma Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Ford Kuga 2.5 Hibrit ST-Line and 2020 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 511 L vs 401 L
  • Engine Power: 225 HP vs 155 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 1.2 L vs 4.5 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Kuga offers 511 liters, while the Ford Puma stands out with 155 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands