bootcapacity.com > Versus > Honda CR-V 1.5 vs Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4

Honda CR-V 1.5 (2020) Vs. Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 (2020)

Honda CR-V 1.5 Executive Lifestyle Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense
2020 Honda CR-V 1.5 Executive Lifestyle Comparison 2020 Mazda CX-3 Power Sense Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Executive Lifestyle Power Sense
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.5 1.5 4x4
Fuel Type Petrol Diesel
Engine Displacement 1498 cc 1499 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type CVT AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears ? 6
Driving System 4x2 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 193 HP 105 HP
Torque 243 Nm 270 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 10.0 sn 11.9 sn
Maximum Speed 200 172

Fuel Consumption

City 8.6 L 5.6 L
Highway 6.2 L 4.9 L
Combined 7.4 L 5.3 L
Fuel Tank 57 L 48 L

Dimensions

Length 4600 mm 4275 mm
Width 1855 mm 1765 mm
Height 1681 mm 1535 mm
Curb Weight 1669 kg 1295 kg
Boot Space 561 L 350 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 235 215
Tire Sidewall 55 50
Wheel Rims Size 19 18
2020 Honda CR-V 1.5 Executive Lifestyle 2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense

Which one is better?

2020 Honda CR-V 1.5 Executive Lifestyle Technical Specifications

2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense Technical Specifications

Honda CR-V vs Mazda CX-3 Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Honda CR-V 1.5 Executive Lifestyle and 2020 Mazda CX-3 1.5 4x4 Power Sense, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 561 L vs 350 L
  • Engine Power: 193 HP vs 105 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 7.4 L vs 5.3 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Honda CR-V offers 561 liters, while the Mazda CX-3 stands out with 105 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands