bootcapacity.com > Versus > Jeep Compass 1.6 Multijet vs Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBlue

Jeep Compass 1.6 Multijet (2020) Vs. Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBlue (2020)

Jeep Compass 1.6 Multijet Longitude Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBlue Titanium
2020 Jeep Compass 1.6 Multijet Longitude Comparison 2020 Ford Kuga Titanium Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Longitude Titanium
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.6 Multijet 1.5 EcoBlue
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine Displacement 1598 cc 1499 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Gearbox Manual Automatic
Number of gears 6 8
Driving System Front Wheel Drive 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 120 HP 120 HP
Torque 320 Nm 300 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 11.2 sn 12.0 sn
Maximum Speed 187 177

Fuel Consumption

City 5.8 L 5.0 L
Highway 3.9 L 4.1 L
Combined 4.8 L 4.5 L
Fuel Tank 60 L 54 L

Dimensions

Length 4394 mm 4614 mm
Width 1874 mm 1883 mm
Height 1629 mm 1678 mm
Curb Weight 1615 kg 1599 kg
Boot Space 438 L 511 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 225 225
Tire Sidewall 50 60
Wheel Rims Size 17 18
2020 Jeep Compass 1.6 Multijet Longitude 2020 Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBlue Titanium

Which one is better?

2020 Jeep Compass 1.6 Multijet Longitude Technical Specifications

2020 Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBlue Titanium Technical Specifications

Jeep Compass vs Ford Kuga Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Jeep Compass 1.6 Multijet Longitude and 2020 Ford Kuga 1.5 EcoBlue Titanium, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 438 L vs 511 L
  • Engine Power: 120 HP vs 120 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 4.8 L vs 4.5 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Jeep Compass offers 438 liters, while the Ford Kuga stands out with 120 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands