bootcapacity.com > Versus > Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI vs Subaru Forester 2.0i AWD

Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI (2020) Vs. Subaru Forester 2.0i AWD (2020)

Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI Crystal Subaru Forester 2.0i AWD e-Sport
2020 Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI Crystal Comparison 2020 Subaru Forester e-Sport Comparison

General Information

Year 2020 2020
Equipment Crystal e-Sport
Body Type SUV SUV

Engine Specs

Engine 1.5 TSI 2.0i AWD
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol & Electric
Engine Displacement 1498 cc 1995 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type DSG Lineartronic
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 7 7
Driving System Front Wheel Drive 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 150 HP 150 HP
Torque 250 Nm 194 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 9.8 sn 11.8 sn
Maximum Speed 198 188

Fuel Consumption

City 7.2 L 7.4 L
Highway 5.4 L 6.4 L
Combined 6.3 L 6.9 L
Fuel Tank 66 L 48 L

Dimensions

Length 4697 mm 4625 mm
Width 1882 mm 1815 mm
Height 1660 mm 1730 mm
Curb Weight 1582 kg 1751 kg
Boot Space 720 L 509 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 235 225
Tire Sidewall 50 55
Wheel Rims Size 19 18
2020 Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI Crystal 2020 Subaru Forester 2.0i AWD e-Sport

Which one is better?

2020 Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI Crystal Technical Specifications

2020 Subaru Forester 2.0i AWD e-Sport Technical Specifications

Skoda Kodiaq vs Subaru Forester Comparison

When deciding between 2020 Skoda Kodiaq 1.5 TSI Crystal and 2020 Subaru Forester 2.0i AWD e-Sport, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 720 L vs 509 L
  • Engine Power: 150 HP vs 150 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 6.3 L vs 6.9 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers 720 liters, while the Subaru Forester stands out with 150 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands