bootcapacity.com > Versus > Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost vs Kia Niro 1.6 4x2

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost (2021) Vs. Kia Niro 1.6 4x2 (2020)

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Kia Niro 1.6 4x2 Elegance
2021 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Comparison 2020 Kia Niro Elegance Comparison

General Information

Year 2021 2020
Equipment ST-Line Elegance
Body Type SUV Crossover

Engine Specs

Engine 1.0 EcoBoost 1.6 4x2
Fuel Type Petrol Hybrid
Engine Displacement 999 cc 1580 cc
Number of Cylinders 3 4

Transmission

Transmission Type AT DCT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 7 6
Driving System 4x2 4x2

Performance

Engine Power 125 HP 141 HP
Torque 200 Nm 265 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 10.2 sn 11.5 sn
Maximum Speed 190 162

Fuel Consumption

City 5.8 L 4.2 L
Highway 4.3 L 3.4 L
Combined 5.0 L 3.8 L
Fuel Tank 42 L 45 L

Dimensions

Length 4207 mm 4355 mm
Width 1805 mm 1805 mm
Height 1536 mm 1545 mm
Curb Weight 1326 kg 1425 kg
Boot Space 456 L 427 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 215 205
Tire Sidewall 50 60
Wheel Rims Size 18 16
2021 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line 2020 Kia Niro 1.6 4x2 Elegance

Which one is better?

2021 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line Technical Specifications

2020 Kia Niro 1.6 4x2 Elegance Technical Specifications

Ford Puma vs Kia Niro Comparison

When deciding between 2021 Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost ST-Line and 2020 Kia Niro 1.6 4x2 Elegance, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 456 L vs 427 L
  • Engine Power: 125 HP vs 141 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.0 L vs 3.8 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Puma offers 456 liters, while the Kia Niro stands out with 141 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands