bootcapacity.com > Versus > Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue vs Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue

2022 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrak vs Stormtrak

Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrak Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue Stormtrak
2022 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrak Comparison 2022 Ford Ranger Stormtrak Comparison

General Information

Year 2022 2022
Equipment Wildtrak Stormtrak
Body Type Pick Up Pick Up

Engine Specs

Engine 2.0 EcoBlue 2.0 EcoBlue
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Engine Displacement 1997 cc 1997 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type AT AT
Gearbox Automatic Automatic
Number of gears 10 10
Driving System 4x4 4x4

Performance

Engine Power 213 HP 213 HP
Torque 500 Nm 500 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 9.0 sn 9.0 sn
Maximum Speed 180 180

Fuel Consumption

City 9.1 L 9.1 L
Highway 7.1 L 7.1 L
Combined 8.1 L 8.1 L
Fuel Tank 80 L 80 L

Dimensions

Length 5359 mm 5359 mm
Width 1977 mm 1977 mm
Height 1821 mm 1821 mm
Curb Weight 2316 kg 2316 kg
Boot Space - L - L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 265 265
Tire Sidewall 60 60
Wheel Rims Size 18 18
2022 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrak 2022 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue Stormtrak

Which one is better?

2022 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrak Technical Specifications

2022 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue Stormtrak Technical Specifications

Ford Ranger vs Ford Ranger Comparison

When deciding between 2022 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue Wildtrak and 2022 Ford Ranger 2.0 EcoBlue Stormtrak, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: - L vs - L
  • Engine Power: 213 HP vs 213 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 8.1 L vs 8.1 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Ford Ranger offers - liters, while the Ford Ranger stands out with 213 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands