bootcapacity.com > Versus > Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI vs Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI

2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Allstar vs Comfortline

Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Allstar Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline
2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Allstar Comparison 2016 Volkswagen Polo Comfortline Comparison

General Information

Year 2016 2016
Equipment Allstar Comfortline
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback

Engine Specs

Engine 1.2 TSI 1.2 TSI
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1197 cc 1197 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type DSG Manual
Gearbox Automatic Manual
Number of gears 7 5
Driving System Front Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive

Performance

Engine Power 90 HP 90 HP
Torque 160 Nm 160 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 10.8 sn 10.8 sn
Maximum Speed 184 184

Fuel Consumption

City 6.0 L 6.0 L
Highway 4.0 L 4.0 L
Combined 5.0 L 5.0 L
Fuel Tank 45 L 45 L

Dimensions

Length 3972 mm 3972 mm
Width 1682 mm 1682 mm
Height 1453 mm 1453 mm
Curb Weight 1139 kg 1107 kg
Boot Space 280 L 280 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 185 185
Tire Sidewall 60 60
Wheel Rims Size 15 15
2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Allstar 2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline

Which one is better?

2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Allstar Technical Specifications

2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline Technical Specifications

Volkswagen Polo vs Volkswagen Polo Comparison

When deciding between 2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Allstar and 2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 280 L vs 280 L
  • Engine Power: 90 HP vs 90 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.0 L vs 5.0 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Volkswagen Polo offers 280 liters, while the Volkswagen Polo stands out with 90 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands