bootcapacity.com > Versus > Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI vs Ford Fiesta 1.25

Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI (2016) Vs. Ford Fiesta 1.25 (2016)

Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline Ford Fiesta 1.25 Trend X
2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline Comparison 2016 Ford Fiesta Trend X Comparison

General Information

Year 2016 2016
Equipment Comfortline Trend X
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback

Engine Specs

Engine 1.2 TSI 1.25
Fuel Type Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1197 cc 1241 cc
Number of Cylinders 4 4

Transmission

Transmission Type Manual Manual
Gearbox Manual Manual
Number of gears 5 5
Driving System Front Wheel Drive Front Wheel Drive

Performance

Engine Power 90 HP 82 HP
Torque 160 Nm 114 Nm
Acceleration 0-100 10.8 sn 13.3 sn
Maximum Speed 184 168

Fuel Consumption

City 6.0 L 6.8 L
Highway 4.0 L 4.3 L
Combined 5.0 L 5.5 L
Fuel Tank 45 L 40 L

Dimensions

Length 3972 mm 3969 mm
Width 1682 mm 1764 mm
Height 1453 mm 1495 mm
Curb Weight 1107 kg 1055 kg
Boot Space 280 L 276 L

Tire and Wheel

Tire Tread 185 195
Tire Sidewall 60 50
Wheel Rims Size 15 15
2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline 2016 Ford Fiesta 1.25 Trend X

Which one is better?

2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline Technical Specifications

2016 Ford Fiesta 1.25 Trend X Technical Specifications

Volkswagen Polo vs Ford Fiesta Comparison

When deciding between 2016 Volkswagen Polo 1.2 TSI Comfortline and 2016 Ford Fiesta 1.25 Trend X, buyers often look at boot capacity, performance, and fuel efficiency. Our detailed table highlights the differences side by side.

Main Differences

  • Boot Space: 280 L vs 276 L
  • Engine Power: 90 HP vs 82 HP
  • Fuel Efficiency (Combined): 5.0 L vs 5.5 L

Verdict

If you prioritize cargo space, the Volkswagen Polo offers 280 liters, while the Ford Fiesta stands out with 82 horsepower performance. The right choice depends on whether you value practicality or driving dynamics.


Recent Comparisons

Popular car comparisons

The Most Popular Car Brands